Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
|
zh-tw:fm_overview [2013/06/19 07:09] Coco [其它方法] |
zh-tw:fm_overview [2013/06/19 07:22] Coco [Download - NAS >> PC] |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 133: | Line 133: | ||
| * 不支援影像與圖片播放。 | * 不支援影像與圖片播放。 | ||
| </WRAP>| [[zh-tw:fm_itunes|iTunes]] | | </WRAP>| [[zh-tw:fm_itunes|iTunes]] | | ||
| - | ===== Benchmark ===== | + | ===== 效能比較 ===== |
| - | Following benchmarks show how long it takes to transfer certain media files using the different methods as mentioned above. | + | 使用相同的設備，驗證不同傳輸方式的效能，提供給您參考。 |
| - | ==== Test Environment ==== | + | ==== 測試環境 ==== |
| - | **Test Files:** | + | **測試檔案:** |
| - | * 500 MP3 files, 50 folders, 1.92GB | + | * 500 MP3 檔案, 50 個目錄, 1.92GB |
| - | * 500 JPG images, 5 folders, 1.92GB | + | * 500 JPG 檔案, 5 個目錄, 1.92GB |
| - | * 4 MPG videos, 1 folder, 1.91GB | + | * 4 MPG 檔案, 1 個目錄, 1.91GB |
| - | **Test Machine:** | + | **測試設備:** |
| - | * NAS: MyCloud Pro | + | * 網路儲存裝置（NAS）: 悠遊雲 MyCloud Pro |
| - | * Firmware: Version 20121224 | + | * 韌體: 20121224 |
| - | * HDD: 2 x 1TB (WD10-EFRX), RAID 0, XFS | + | * 硬碟: 2 x 1TB (WD10-EFRX), RAID 0, XFS |
| - | **Test Computers:** | + | **測試電腦:** |
| * Mac: Mac Book Pro, Mac OS 10.8.2, 2.4GHz Intel Core 2 Duo processor, 2GB memory | * Mac: Mac Book Pro, Mac OS 10.8.2, 2.4GHz Intel Core 2 Duo processor, 2GB memory | ||
| * PC: Windows 7 Pro, 3.33GHz Intel Core i7 processor, 6GB memory | * PC: Windows 7 Pro, 3.33GHz Intel Core i7 processor, 6GB memory | ||
| - | **Test Software:** | + | **測試軟體:** |
| * FTP client: FileZilla v3.6.0.2 | * FTP client: FileZilla v3.6.0.2 | ||
| * WebDAV client: Cyberduck v4.2.1 | * WebDAV client: Cyberduck v4.2.1 | ||
| - | + | ==== 上傳 - Mac >> NAS ==== | |
| - | ==== Upload - Mac >> NAS ==== | + | |
| {{:benchmark-mac-to-nas.png?nolink|}} | {{:benchmark-mac-to-nas.png?nolink|}} | ||
| - | ==== Download - NAS >> Mac ==== | + | ==== 下載 - NAS >> Mac ==== |
| {{:benchmark-nas-to-mac.png?nolink|}} | {{:benchmark-nas-to-mac.png?nolink|}} | ||
| - | <note>For the web interface, it's not possible to download more than one file at the time. Because of that, for the download test, the files were added to a ZIP archive. The resulting transfer rate is therefore faster in comparison to the upload, where the files were not combined in a single ZIP archive.</note> | + | <note>Web GUI 下載時需要先將所有檔案打包成1個 Zip 檔，所以下載所花得時間較上傳要多。</note> |
| - | ==== Upload - PC >> NAS ==== | + | ==== 上傳 - PC >> NAS ==== |
| {{:benchmark-pc-to-nas.png?nolink|}} | {{:benchmark-pc-to-nas.png?nolink|}} | ||
| - | <note>The photos and music results for the WebDAV upload were out of range for this benchmark. For music, the transfer completed after 9:54 m:ss and for photos, it completed after 10:29 m:ss.</note> | + | <note>圖片與音樂檔案在 WebDAV 上傳時，雖然在 9分:54秒 顯示完成時間，但是真正完成時間是 10分:29秒。</note> |
| - | + | ==== 下載 - NAS >> PC ==== | |
| - | ==== Download - NAS >> PC ==== | + | |
| {{:benchmark-nas-to-pc.png?nolink|}} | {{:benchmark-nas-to-pc.png?nolink|}} | ||
| - | <note>For the web interface, it's not possible to download more than one file at the time. Because of that, for the download test, the files were added to a ZIP archive. The resulting transfer rate is therefore faster in comparison to the upload, where the files were not combined in a single ZIP archive.</note> | + | <note>Web GUI 下載時需要先將所有檔案打包成1個 Zip 檔，所以下載所花得時間較上傳要多。</note> |
