This is an old revision of the document!
Table of Contents
檔案管理概觀
比較
協定 | 網際網路 | 區域網路 | 傳輸 | 預覽 | 優點 | 缺點 | 用於… | 無法用於… | 備註 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
瀏覽器 | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ |
|
|
|
| Browser |
SMB | ✔ | ✘ | ✔ | ✔ |
|
|
|
| Windows Mac |
AFP | ✔ | ✘ | ✔ | ✔ |
|
|
|
| Mac |
NFS | ✔ | ✘ | ✔ | ✔ |
|
|
|
| Mac |
FTP | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✘ |
|
|
|
| Windows Mac |
WebDAV | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ |
|
|
|
| Windows Mac |
其它方法
協定 | 網際網路 | 區域網路 | 傳輸 | 預覽 | 優點 | 缺點 | 用於… | 無法用於… | 備註 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mobile app | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ |
|
|
|
| Android iOS |
UPnP media server | ✔ | ✘ | ✘ | ✔ |
|
|
|
| UPnP |
iTunes music server | ✔ | ✘ | ✘ | ✔ |
|
|
|
| iTunes |
Benchmark
Following benchmarks show how long it takes to transfer certain media files using the different methods as mentioned above.
Test Environment
Test Files:
- 500 MP3 files, 50 folders, 1.92GB
- 500 JPG images, 5 folders, 1.92GB
- 4 MPG videos, 1 folder, 1.91GB
Test Machine:
- NAS: MyCloud Pro
- Firmware: Version 20121224
- HDD: 2 x 1TB (WD10-EFRX), RAID 0, XFS
Test Computers:
- Mac: Mac Book Pro, Mac OS 10.8.2, 2.4GHz Intel Core 2 Duo processor, 2GB memory
- PC: Windows 7 Pro, 3.33GHz Intel Core i7 processor, 6GB memory
Test Software:
- FTP client: FileZilla v3.6.0.2
- WebDAV client: Cyberduck v4.2.1
Upload - Mac >> NAS
Download - NAS >> Mac
For the web interface, it's not possible to download more than one file at the time. Because of that, for the download test, the files were added to a ZIP archive. The resulting transfer rate is therefore faster in comparison to the upload, where the files were not combined in a single ZIP archive.
Upload - PC >> NAS
The photos and music results for the WebDAV upload were out of range for this benchmark. For music, the transfer completed after 9:54 m:ss and for photos, it completed after 10:29 m:ss.
Download - NAS >> PC
For the web interface, it's not possible to download more than one file at the time. Because of that, for the download test, the files were added to a ZIP archive. The resulting transfer rate is therefore faster in comparison to the upload, where the files were not combined in a single ZIP archive.
Conclusion
Following recommendations are not based solely on the best transfer rates but on the best overall user experience.
Who/Where/When | What | Why |
---|---|---|
Beginners Anywhere | Web interface | No explanations or software installation needed and it works with all browsers. |
Home network Large file backup | Samba | Ease of use once the network drive is mounted and fast transfer rates. |
Home network Media playback | UPnP media server iTunes music server | Streaming does not require user login, easy and convenient for media playback. |
Remote access Quick uploads | Web interface Mobile app | MyAkitio web portal automatically redirects user to network drive at home, no further setup required. |
Advanced users Remote access Large file backup | FTP | Best transfer rate for remote access and FTP client provides additional functions (e.g. pause, resume, error log). |